首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and PCR Analysis of Polymorphisms on the mec Hypervariable Region for Typing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
【2h】

Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and PCR Analysis of Polymorphisms on the mec Hypervariable Region for Typing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

机译:脉冲场凝胶电泳的比较和mec高变区多态性的PCR分析,以鉴定耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two hundred fifty-four methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were tested by PCR for the mec-associated hypervariable region (HVR-PCR) to determine their number of direct repeat units (DRUs). Eight different groups of repeats were found among the MRSA strains and compared to 28 pulsotypes classified by PFGE. Some MRSA strains belonging to the same pulsotype showed different numbers of DRUs. HVR-PCR was rapid, easy to perform, and reproducible and has the ability to obtain an unambiguous positive result for each isolate analyzed. However, this technique shows a discriminatory power inferior to that of PFGE. We conclude that PFGE is a more reliable method of typing MRSA than HVR-PCR.
机译:通过PCR测试了脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)分型的254株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的mec相关高变区(HVR-PCR),以确定其直接重复单元(DRU)的数量)。在MRSA菌株中发现了八组不同的重复序列,并与PFGE分类的28种脉冲型进行了比较。属于相同脉冲型的一些MRSA菌株显示出不同数量的DRU。 HVR-PCR快速,易于执行且可重现,并且能够为每个分析的分离株获得明确的阳性结果。但是,该技术显示出比PFGE更低的区分能力。我们得出的结论是,PFGE比HVR-PCR是一种更可靠的MRSA分型方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号